Blogging through Wikipedia (2020)

W-Extra. “For quality control of Wiki.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  Wikipedia's editing model and wiki approach support editing changes and audacity. However, on some Wikipedias, it has been shown that some new wrong edits have a point of precedence over new good ones. As the entire edits to the article get closer to N, the quality improves (with unspecified features) from that point on, quality tends to level or degrade with further editing. Therefore, when the article reaches this quality level, further editing should be investigated further. This is called article quality defense. Interesting Point.  I think Wikipedia needs a more sophisticated system in order to provide better quality articles. A group advisory group that can confirm the accuracy of knowledge, such as a scholarship group. Discussion.  How can I improve the quality of Wikipedia?

W-Extra. “CC limitations.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization founded in 2001 with the purpose of partially sharing copyrights. The agency created the Creative Commons License (CCL), a copyright license on December 16, 2002. A typical project under the Creative Commons License (CCL) is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is licensed under a dual license of Creative Commons (CCL) and GNU Free Documentation (GFDL). Interesting Point.   I am very supportive of CC. However, there are limits to this. The original copyright holder initially promised partial sharing, but after that you may want to limit copyright to make money. However, there seems to be no policy. Discussion.   How can I overcome the limitations of CC?

W-Extra. “For a small number of opinions to be respected in Wiki.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Voting is one of the best ways to quantify opinions in large groups. Online communities with a common goal are constantly making decisions. In a small group of similarly thought individuals, consensus decisions can often be found in discussion. VotingIsEvil from such a group. However, as the group grows, it becomes CommunityMayNotScale. Each member of the group is likely not to agree with one of the existing members. According to MetcalfesLaw, the probability of conflict between two individuals increases geometrically. According to ReedsLaw, the likelihood of collisions between two subgroups increases exponentially. If an individual with objections is Community Exiled, the group can yield to GroupThink. If not excluded, you can delay the settlement decision indefinitely. Interesting Point.  I am well aware that voting majority in democracy is not a universal solution. This is because v...

W-Extra. “To improve online culture.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Fortunately, Wikipedia Ace Class Shadow provided helpful advice, recognizing that there was no perfect solution. Use the template to indicate that the discussion page is archived, or "take fair action to get closer to action and respect their common sense judgment. To this day there was once a closure that seemed completely inaccurate with this method."  In this debate, I'm not sure if these guidelines could convince the minority to support the legitimacy of the “use as needed” policy as a consistent suffix. Therefore, no punishment was offered to the parties for “cases of previous policy violations” beyond accusations of individual attacks and “some uncertainty about how to determine whether or not there is consensus in a particular case”. This is the ambiguity and challenge of consensus practice, and a source of temptation to use some voting systems. Interesting Point.  I am aware of the occasional v...

W-Extra. “The world information repository should be the world public sphere.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary HG Wells thought that the “World Encyclopedia” should be more than an information store and a “coordination and coordination agency”. I raised this debate early to explain Wikipedia's two opposing philosophies: inclusionism and deletionism. This issue and the proliferation of articles have caused much more minor debate, though not Belly Coz. If every TV show episode has its own article, how do you name these articles so that they don't conflict with other articles? This discussion demonstrates the misunderstanding of consensus and the difficulty of these decision-making practices in the public community. Interesting Point.  As mentioned in the summary, I think Wikipedia should act as a'public field' rather than just a repository. Discussing in a place where information is gathered is because you can exchange high-quality opinions as if you were talking in a libr...

W-Extra. “With the CC, the era of true information freedom opens.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization founded in 2001 with the purpose of partially sharing copyrights. The agency created the Creative Commons License (CCL), a copyright license on December 16, 2002. A typical project under the Creative Commons License (CCL) is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is licensed under a dual license of Creative Commons (CCL) and GNU Free Documentation (GFDL). Interesting Point. I actively support the CC movement. Of course, personal copyright is very important, but I think that the value of information on the Internet must be allowed to some degree in order to shine more. So I hope that this culture will be expanded. Discussion.  However, CC culture in Korea is unfamiliar. How do you popularize it?