Blogging through Wikipedia (2020)

What do you think are going to be important communication technology? Recent years have seen a major shift as Internet becomes mobile- we can use it "on the go." through laptops, smartphones and tablets. Soon we may able to access Internet through googles other ways. I think 5G is an important communication technology in the future. Fifth-generation communication technology is a future technology that connects mobile devices and networks at high speeds. 5G technology with fully connected sensors and devices will change the economy and business policy. Furthermore, it will serve as a basic platform for the entire ecosystem that breaks down geographical and cultural boundaries. 5G aims to receive content as soon as it is sent. In the future, intelligent connections and sensors will enable people to recognize and interact with objects around them or even thousands of kilometers away. If data is continuously collected and analyzed using sensors, devices can act on behalf o...

Wikipedia is not the first project which aims to collect and organize the "sum total of human knowledge" but it is the most efficient of all attempts to do so. Why? Wikipedia can get information from all fields of knowledge. Regardless of the subject, there is information about all kinds of knowledge and there is no need for experts in each field of knowledge. Wikipedia is therefore a collection of "the sum of human knowledge." Other websites do not have a "discussion"  where only experts can answer and freely express their opinions. Wikipedia is open to everyone, whether they are students, office workers, or professionals, if they have knowledge in the field.  In this regard, Wikipedia seems to be able to develop into a website that gathers information from all fields of knowledge. In fact, there are few such pages except Wikipedia. Instead, Wikipedia has five strict rules: "WikiPedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia looks from a neutral perspe...

Why do people contribute to Wikipedia? Wikipedia attracts volunteers (editor), editing them. What Fey don't get them. So, Why do people to contribute to Wikipedia? First, 69 percent of people like to share their knowledge. In addition, 64 percent of people, failure or incorrect information wants to fix it. 50 % of people wanted to know about a subject not handled right. Also wanted to learn new skills, and to spread the knowledge they wanted to expand. There is a person who is able to edit Wikipedia's debate and wanted to see whether friends or family wanted to participate in or college and taking part in the Wikipedia.There was also because through editing at school or work reasons. The last reason is why I am to participate in the Wikipedia editing.  Only 2 percent of people edit because of school assignments or jobs. But now I'm having fun sharing my knowledge with Wikipedia and I've included in 69%

 Who do you think edits Wikipedia? The young, the old,female, male, Americans, Koreans?  I think men in their 30s have the most editors. And in actuality,   According to the worldwide Wikipedia Editors Survey 2011 of all the Wikipedias, 91% of editors are male. However, the number of women editors is on the rise.   On January 30, 2011, an article in the New York Times quoted the Wikimedia Foundation's announcement and reported that less than 13 percent of the Wikipedia contributors were women. So why does this result? The "Discussion" page, where discussions are made about the contents of the document, is not attractive to women because of its highly controversial nature, but rather can give them "fear as soon as they see it." Women also have equal knowledge of men and can defend their point of view, but" disputes, arguments, and fierce defense are still often considered masculine in American society, and women's remarks in this tone can lead to negat...

 Do you think Wikipedia is right to reject censorship? I think Wikipedia needs censorship. In particular, Wikipedia is a collective intelligence page that everyone can edit, so there may be misinformation or someone maliciously interferes with. There are small numbers of trolls and other disruptive editors who are seeking to edit our Wikipedia. Wikipedia has tens of thousands of volunteers (editors) but certainly has trolls. In order to manage this, Wikipedia administrators are also necessary and there is a reality.Censorship is necessary because in Internet culture, Internet trolls deliberately post controversial, inflammatory, wild or off-topic, or offensive or offensive content on the public Internet, causing people's emotional reactions and lowering the productivity of the gathering.  The fact that Wikipedia is vulnerable to mischief or editing to distort information also causes it to lose accuracy and credibility. Korean Wikipedia on February 28, 2017 as an example i...

Categorization Summary Wikipedia is increasingly developed for user convenience. Wikipedia is adding more functions as well as simple modifications. Categories play an important role in Wikipedia. The function of a category is to group pages under similar themes. Helps readers find and navigate the subject area, view pages arranged by title, and find article relationships. Wikipedia pages categorize the characteristics of readers, knowledge, essentials, definitions, and topics into categories. Categories are usually at the bottom of the article page. Click a category name to go to that particular category. It is also possible to support navigation with subclassification. Review This page shows you in detail how to use the cafe chain. I think one of the most important things in Wikipedia is the category. If the categories are well separated, I can quickly find the information I want and it is much more useful. I thought the only way to classify the article was in the Table of Co...

Article development Summary I learned how to write Wikipedia articles well and how to move on to the next level. To find or develop an article that has not been written first and set a topic. You can also write articles by looking for related articles or books. Attaching appropriate relevant images or graphics is one of the ways in which the quality of the article increases. It also asks for comments from fellow editors and looks for areas to improve. This page was very useful for editing Wikipedia. Review  The first step in writing Wikipedia articles is to search and find articles that have not yet been written. I found this process the hardest when I first edited Wikipedia. I wanted to deal with what I was interested in, but there were many articles that already existed. Therefore, I chose to continue adding content to existing articles that already exist. It is also a good way to find an article to develop. It was fun because I could write the article as I wanted if I pas...

Creative Commons Summary Wikimedia Commons is a media repository created and managed by volunteers. Free encyclopedia, Wikipedia, offers a central repository for free license photos, diagrams, animations, music, voice text, video clips and all kinds of media that are useful for the most popular Wikimedia project. Anyone can put data on this site. You must have a free license to upload images. Most of the images on the Internet are copyrighted and should not be used unless there is a justifiable reason. One of the key principles of Wikimedia Commons is that the content stored here must be freely reusable anywhere in the world in the same way as the encyclopedia content (licensed with CC BY-SA). This means we restrict free content. In addition, the process use applies only to the use of the edit context and not to the media repository. Copyright laws vary from country to country. Thus, there can be many different ways to use the process. Each country has one unique interpretation, a...

Free culture movement & Remix culture A free cultural movement is one that can freely modify and distribute content about society. The Free Culture Movement opposes excessively restrictive copyright laws. Because this hinders creativity. This movement is free to exchange ideas. The first person to do this exercise was Stewart Brand. He tried to gain access to information through the "Longer Copyright Act." Commons (CC) is the organization that is commonly associated with free culture. CC encourages creative sharing and spreading of ideas for cultural activities, scientific advances and business breakthroughs. Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages derivatives by combining or editing existing materials to create new creations or products. Remix culture is basically about allowing copyright owners efforts to improve, change, integrate, or otherwise remix their work. Combining content has been a common practice, but has been increasingly limited by increas...

Wikipedia culture & Wikipedia in culture American society makes better use of Wikipedia than Korea. People feature individuals who use Wikipedia as reference work or positively compare intelligence with Wikipedia. Also, in some cases Wikipedia is not used as an encyclopedia at all, but instead as a character trait or game. Thus Wikipedia has become culturally important. As Wikipedia grows, it has been mentioned in various cultural fields. He used Wikipedia in various cultures such as movie critics, sociology professors, researchers, comedians, and so on. But there were also critics of Wikipedia. Someone mentioned Wikipedia terms and ambiguity, and someone criticized Wikipedia for having false information about itself. The inaccuracies of the Wikipedia have also been culturally described. There was an argument for the negative impact of Wikipedia on culture. Wikipedia argued that the proliferation of user-generated content obscures and devalues existing high-quality information ...

Reliability of Wikipedia and Reliable sources Wikipedia is edited voluntarily by a volunteer editor.Since Wikipedia is done online, it has been criticized for the reliability of facts in the editing process. There may be false information because anyone can edit it anonymously. Inaccurate information has not been modified for months. The reliability of Wikipedia articles is based on the accuracy of the information provided within the article, the adequacy of the images provided with the article, the appropriateness of the style and focus of the article, the sensitivity to false information, and the exclusion and elimination of false information. Wikipedia articles should be based on a well-known and reliable source of factual confirmation and accuracy. When quoting, one of the work itself, the author, or the publisher of the work affects reliability. Wikipedia should present a neutral perspective. The source should be free from prejudice. Political articles may contain some politic...

Good Faith Collaboration Wikipedia has many collaborative systems. The most interesting thing for me was the Wikimedia Foundation. The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit charity. Mainly the main goal of the general foundation is to increase profits. But the biggest goal of the Wikimedia Foundation is to develop, maintain and manage Wikipedia and to release the entire content to people free of charge. Wikimedia has few copyright restrictions and is based on volunteers and resources, which is one of the reasons why Wikipedia is growing so much. At first, the foundation was executed by volunteers. Currently, however, more than 350 employees and contractors work. This means that the foundation has become very large. Also, Wikipedia's administrators think it is one of the reasons why it has become one of the top five websites in the world. Administrators can manage Wikipedia's biggest weakness, various disputes, restrict inappropriate articles or untrue news, and block conf...

A Globe in Accord Wikipedia is available to everyone in the world. Thus, Wikipedia's logo is an incomplete shape of a world puzzle and the pieces represent different languages. The first of Wikipedia's success factors is its focus on technology. Technology played an important role in cooperation and the techniques to cooperate with network technology gave people openness and accessibility. This has increased people's responsibility and promoted socialization with new people. Also, functions such as change documents, discussions, and adding tools are so easy that I think everyone, including myself, can edit them. And on the discussion page, people actively share their knowledge and opinions. I think strong cooperation has been achieved because Wikipedia's editing techniques are easy to access. But what other factors have Wikipedia been able to do with collective intelligence besides these technologies?

Encyclopedic Anxiety Wikipedia has caused social unrest. Wikipedia is a place where discussions are activated because anyone can edit and collaborate. Much as reference works might inspire passionate dedication in their contributors, they also, seemingly, can inspire passionate disparagement.    Wikipedia can also be authoritative. There are elements to this in the arguments about Wikipedia, particularly over the way it is produced. Describing how knowledge is constituted can be difficult, but one can identify three ways for how we might think of knowledge production throughout history . First, you should know that an encyclopedia with little contact with people is useless. Second, the production of reference work eventually surpassed everyone's ability. Finally, there is Wikipedia and other open content. In earlier chapters I explore how this community and its culture facilitate the production of an encyclopedia Reference works can prompt and embody currents of social ...

The Benevolent Dictator   I wondered why the title of this chapter was "The Benevolent Dictator." Contradictions were felt  between the two words "Benevolent" and "dictator."   However, after reading this chapter, questions were answered. In this chapter, the term "dictator" continues to be used to describe leadership behavior from the decision making process of a group. Wikipedia is a voluntary effort, with the exception of most Wikimedia Foundation staff, with little room for coercion or practical compensation. Therefore, Wikipedia needs a manager with strong leadership because it has a variety of people and conflicts can arise. In Wikipedia, administrators can quickly prevent and intervene in malicious editing. It can also effectively mediate or resolve disputes. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone and can give their own opinions, so there is a lot of discussion, which cannot always be peaceful.  Therefore, I felt the need for a dic...

The Challenges of Consensus Wikipedia has established the Arbitration Committee to reach consensus. This is a skilled user panel that exists to seek a binding solution to the Wikipedia dispute that could not be resolved by a joint discussion, manager or arbitration. Requirements of Consensus are inclusive (“as many stakeholders as possible”), participatory (“actively solicit the input and participation of all”), cooperative (“reach the best possible decision for the group and all of its members”), egalitarian (“equal input” with the “opportunity to table, amend and veto or ‘block’ proposals”), and solution-oriented (“emphasize common agreement over differences”). Agreements are not about quickly calculating "yes" or "no," but about reaching the best possible solution. Of course, an agreement does not mean unanimous. The progress and outcome of the agreement are rarely guaranteed, but focus on the potential benefits of deliberation rather than the speed of t...

There are two complementary postures at the heart of Wikipedia collaboration: the stances of “Neutral Point of View” (NPOV) and good faith. A Neutral Point of View is to participate in a fair debate without prejudice rather than defending either side. This is an argument that includes facts, not opinions themselves, when talking about opinions. To this end, we must always be objective. George Von Krogh identifies five dimensions relevant to the successful creation of knowledge within a community: mutual trust, active empathy, access to help, lenience in judgment, and courage. We share the love of knowledge and treat everyone who shares the same love with respect and good faith. In the end, Neutral Point of View makes the subject of a collaborative encyclopedia compatible, and a good faith makes cooperation possible. Can Wikipedia actually collaborate? Wikipedia is composed of anonymous and have a different point of view. In addition, religion, politics is different. I ...

What wikis other than Wikipedia and WMF projects have you used? One day I saw Wikinews while searching for an assignment. Wikinews is really useful. Because Wikinews can see today's headlines and the latest news and can discuss articles with users. It is also a great advantage to be able to write articles directly. However, it was not used for the assignment. Because the references used in the task should be objective and professional. However, Wikinews, which anyone can write about, is not entirely true.   Also, Andrew Lih wrote "it's not clear that the wiki process really gears itself towards deadlines and group narrative writing" and that "if you're trying to write something approaching a feature piece, it's much harder to get more than two or three people to stay consistent with the style. I agree on this. The second useful thing I used was Wikidata. Wikidata is also available for commercial purposes without permission. Wikidata records not only s...

How do we participate in Web2.0? How do we create the modern-day culture? Web 2.0 is a web technology in which users produce information directly and communicate in two-way based on the spirit of openness, participation and sharing. We have a lot of participation when we use the Internet. For example, we can run our own blog and communicate with users in areas of interest. I also blog and record my interests and daily life and communicate with my interested neighbors. Whenever I buy any product, I watch reviews on blogs or YouTube. And with cyber culture emerging, it has become an era where people can communicate through comments. Various conversations, logical discussions, and discussions can be made through comments, and emotional expressions of opposition or extremely simple counter-argument can also be made. Comments have become a tool for active communication as they have become a means of discussion and sharing knowledge among netizens. Various SNS such as Facebook and Twitte...

I learned the history and purpose of Wikipedia through this chapter. Jimmy Wales, cofounder of Wikipedia and its Nupedia progenitor, sent his first message to the Nupedia email list: “My dream is that someday this encyclopedia will be available for just the cost of printing to schoolhouses across the world, including ‘3rd world’ countries that won’t be able to afford widespread internet access for years. the communication of ideas across national and confessional boundaries; the ability of individuals, where ever they lived, whatever their social status, to participate in a universal conversation . I think Wikipedia is like Utopia on the Internet. It is a service for information alienation. And it was touching that Wikipedia was first created to maximize access to information. Jimmy considered the power of human solidarity important. Also, it took a lot of time for Wikipedia to be created because it took a lot of effort. The history recounted in this chapter speaks to the...