WK 1. Why are you taking this class? - Hanane Ben abdeslam

Since I started my study “Communication” in The Netherlands, I was more interested in the developments of our society instead of putting a brand on the market. But unfortunately, I couldn’t specialize in this area, so when I saw this course on the list, I knew that I had to take this course. The world is constantly changing. In recent decades our society has developed from a homogenous, orderly and stable society to a society with enormous variety and diversity. This means what is necessary for society, for the groups of people who are part of it. Beside getting more interested in the society, I also want to understand more of someone’s perspective of a situation, person, idea and others. To discuss this with my fellow students, I really wonder how they think of a topic and what their opinion is. That’s why I like to discuss things with people because everyone has their own point of view.

Last but not least, I also find the “Wikipedia” assignment really interesting and, that we would write a Wikipedia page, in our own words and with our own conclusions because in my home country it was more of a no-go to get your sources from Wikipedia and use it in your papers. For me it is really weird to use Wikipedia as a source because I know that anyone can edit and that there are many people who just want to fool around. Therefore, I still think that Wikipedia is a non-reliable source and maybe it will change my mind after this class…

Hanane Ben abdeslam

Comments

  1. 박효정 HyoJung ParkMarch 29, 2020 at 7:19 AM

    I thought exactly the same thing about Wikipedia. In Korea, It's undesirable to use Wikipedia as reference for your paper too. I wonder how our minds will change after this class.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WK 5.2 The Benevolent Dictator - Hanane Ben Abdeslam

In the reading it starts with the example of a “Neo-Nazi” dictator, it didn’t say when it exactly happened but I think it was during World War I and II. This dictator just did what he wanted to do, locking articles down, ban people, and protecting their own reputation and integrity. Actually, for someone to have that much power by a community founder is not unique to Wikipedia. Such leaders are often found in a project around, which a community develops, or otherwise emerge from a leaderless context by way of merit. However, Wikipedia is not an anarchy, democracy, nor a monarchy. Because of the voluntary and meritocratic character of open content communities it is not surprising that leaders are expected to lead by example as their very leadership is founded upon exemplary behavior. This means that leadership emerges through action rather than appointment. The prominent leader of an open content community is sometimes characterizing as a benevolent dictator. This is a variation on a t...
Read more

W2. What is Wikipedia - Seungju Lee

Summary Wikipedia is a multilingual online encyclopedia as an collaboration project. It isn't made by one people. Anyone can write and share information. It is maintained by non profit organizations. It is the largest and most popular  general reference work on the World Wide Web, and is one of the 20 most popular websites. Diverse information can be found in encyclopedia. Interesting point Wikipedia is made by group. All people in group can share their own information. Not only expert, but also anyone who have interest in topic, they can participate in make dictionary. I had a negative opinion about this in past, because this can affect on accuracy of information. But, after I realized that  this is "collaboration" project, many people can give a feedback to writers who post wrong information. So I could change my mind that that kind of feedback make good circulation on advance of wikipedia. And also it is collaboration project,  so I think variety of informat...
Read more

W7. Good Faith Collaboration / Kim Seon Woo

Summary   Wikipedia's culture includes the topics of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. The 2010 book. This book was first published on August 27, 2010 through MIT Press and has a preface to Lawrence Lessig.   This book is an ethnographic study of Wikipedia's history, practical and theoretical pioneers, and culture, including consensus and collaboration practices. This book is described as a pioneering ethnographic study of Wikipedia culture. Reagle's main paper was summed up with the claim that "Wikipedia's success may be less technical than the results of Wikipedia's community and their cultural norms." Interesting Point It is interesting to discuss Wikipedia's fundamental principle of operation, 'cooperation'. Wikipedia, which can be seen as an integral part of modern technology, would not be possible without cooperation. Discussion Does Wikipedia only have cooperation? How should conflict ...
Read more