W4. Free culture Yeonjae Kim 김영재

10years ago, people didn't consider about copyright in korea. They just listened to music online for free and watched movie, tv show for free. But now, people listen to music by online streaming service and watch movie from the Netflix or etc.

People are changed. The reason is developing of technology I think. 10years ago, people didn't pay their money to download music or movie. Because they could get music and movie for free very easily. Of course we can get music and movie for free now, but It is more comfortable that just pay some money and get music or movie 'legally'. We don't need to try to find some free music or movie, but just pay.

It is also important that people's mind is changed. However I think the developing of technology is also important.


Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 11, 2020 at 11:46 PM

    I agree on your opinion that both changes in technology and mind are important in how people care about copyrights. Back then, the people were so called, the 'digital immigrants', who weren't exposed to the digital culture when they were kid but they got familiar with it as they grew. So, people in those times thought that digital assets are kind of 'free for all'. But people who buys most of digital products are the people who lived through their life with the digital machines. They are called as the 'digital natives'. Since they had more time to learn about how to make the digital norms more healthy, they just know that getting a product without paying is wrong, even if it is in the digital world. This familiarity rate of digital society was possible because of the development of technology. No babies could be called the digital natives, if they couldn't get the smartphone cheap enough to be commercialized.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WK 5.2 The Benevolent Dictator - Hanane Ben Abdeslam

In the reading it starts with the example of a “Neo-Nazi” dictator, it didn’t say when it exactly happened but I think it was during World War I and II. This dictator just did what he wanted to do, locking articles down, ban people, and protecting their own reputation and integrity. Actually, for someone to have that much power by a community founder is not unique to Wikipedia. Such leaders are often found in a project around, which a community develops, or otherwise emerge from a leaderless context by way of merit. However, Wikipedia is not an anarchy, democracy, nor a monarchy. Because of the voluntary and meritocratic character of open content communities it is not surprising that leaders are expected to lead by example as their very leadership is founded upon exemplary behavior. This means that leadership emerges through action rather than appointment. The prominent leader of an open content community is sometimes characterizing as a benevolent dictator. This is a variation on a t...
Read more

W2. What is Wikipedia - Seungju Lee

Summary Wikipedia is a multilingual online encyclopedia as an collaboration project. It isn't made by one people. Anyone can write and share information. It is maintained by non profit organizations. It is the largest and most popular  general reference work on the World Wide Web, and is one of the 20 most popular websites. Diverse information can be found in encyclopedia. Interesting point Wikipedia is made by group. All people in group can share their own information. Not only expert, but also anyone who have interest in topic, they can participate in make dictionary. I had a negative opinion about this in past, because this can affect on accuracy of information. But, after I realized that  this is "collaboration" project, many people can give a feedback to writers who post wrong information. So I could change my mind that that kind of feedback make good circulation on advance of wikipedia. And also it is collaboration project,  so I think variety of informat...
Read more

W2. What is Wikipedia? / Juhee Cha

After reading http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc/foreward.html http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc/preface-web.html http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc/preface.html *Summary Wikipedia is a collaborative community that can freely and voluntarily make changes to the world. empower people to a wide The people who share knowledge here are not for the sake of money but for the people who love knowledge sharing itself. The data that you normally seek for knowledge is limited. These materials are difficult to produce and logically technical. But Wikipedia makes those processes simple. Wikipedia goes through the process of discussing drafts, sending comments, pointing out what is missing, and presenting ideas. *Interesting Point There was also definitely a negative perception of the Internet dictionary before taking the class. The biggest reason for this was that the public, not the 'experts', could modify it. But rather, after learning about Wikipedia's principles, I changed m...
Read more