W6. Conclusion: "A Globe in Accord" / Yerim Han (한예림)
1) summary
We justify and rationalize mistakes. This is why when Wikipedia vegan to experience its first serious Growing Pains Walls collated for a "cult of co-operation" unlike the "culture of culture in engineering in Uset." You can further adjust which documents, discussion pages, templates, and automated tools you can access. However, while technology is important, it is enough. Despite the Wikipedia dust, many projects have failed. This is why the question of "How is something like Wiki Fidia possible?" leads me to the question of "How can you understand the collaborative culture of Wiki Fidia. People understand Wiki as a buzzword, suggesting that they can really change business, government, or anything like magic. Observing the exaggerated expressions of these technologies, some critics ask back what happens to individual differences and social ties. People who left Wikipedia start afresh on another Wikipedia as part of its legacy. In the most extreme and improbable cases, Wikipedia will still be an amazing phenomenon. Not because it's perfect, but because it's confusingly great, I expect Wikipedia will continue to surprise us.
2) learning/interesting point
The most interesting thing about Wiki was that even those who left him were likely to be back on another Wikipedia. And in it, Wikipedia felt the greatness of Wikipedia in that it could continue to raise people's expectations even if it had various problems.
3) discussion
I want to discuss why people who have left Wiki can work in other Wikipedia.
We justify and rationalize mistakes. This is why when Wikipedia vegan to experience its first serious Growing Pains Walls collated for a "cult of co-operation" unlike the "culture of culture in engineering in Uset." You can further adjust which documents, discussion pages, templates, and automated tools you can access. However, while technology is important, it is enough. Despite the Wikipedia dust, many projects have failed. This is why the question of "How is something like Wiki Fidia possible?" leads me to the question of "How can you understand the collaborative culture of Wiki Fidia. People understand Wiki as a buzzword, suggesting that they can really change business, government, or anything like magic. Observing the exaggerated expressions of these technologies, some critics ask back what happens to individual differences and social ties. People who left Wikipedia start afresh on another Wikipedia as part of its legacy. In the most extreme and improbable cases, Wikipedia will still be an amazing phenomenon. Not because it's perfect, but because it's confusingly great, I expect Wikipedia will continue to surprise us.
2) learning/interesting point
The most interesting thing about Wiki was that even those who left him were likely to be back on another Wikipedia. And in it, Wikipedia felt the greatness of Wikipedia in that it could continue to raise people's expectations even if it had various problems.
3) discussion
I want to discuss why people who have left Wiki can work in other Wikipedia.
I think the reason why people who leave Wiki can work for other Wikipedia is that people are not only interested in one field, but also have knowledge in many areas, even if they are not professional. I think this can happen because everyone has a wide variety of areas of knowledge. Even with a little knowledge.
ReplyDelete