W10/ Free-culture movement/ Lee Hayoung

The free cultural movement is to encourage the free distribution and modification of information related to social movements and to creatively open up to others on the Internet. That is why the movement opposes copyright laws that are excessively restrictive. Too much restriction stifles people's creativity. People call such a system a licensed culture. To authorize the sharing and reprocessing of many works under various conditions. Like this, the free cultural movement has a great feature of free exchange of ideas, and is connected not only to open source Swiftware, but also to other movements or philosophies such as open access, remix culture and hacker culture. It also approaches the Knowledge Exercise Copylift Exercise and Public Movement.

In fact, unlike the Copyright Act, I realized for the first time that there is a separate name for a culture that allows users to freely use and reprocess their creations. I thought that being licensed to process as long as there was permission from the creator belonged to a kind of copyright law, but when I read this article, the free culture movement was different from the copyright law. This point was interesting.

However, I think it may be ambiguous to set a standard that distinguishes plagiarism, unauthorized copying or reprocessing, secondary processing from the free cultural movement. In this era of a flood of diverse creations, individual copyrights are also a very important factor, so what more is needed to proceed with the free cultural movement without violating copyright?