W7. Good Faith Collaboration / CAI MUBO

I was deeply touched after reading the book. With the spread of Wikipedia, sister programs such as WikiLeaks and Wiki Textbooks came along.Despite its strong advocacy of the two requirements of verifiable neutrality in official policy, Wikipedia has been criticized by many in society for its ability to participate in editing by anyone, including the quality of its subject, the accuracy of its information, the objectivity of its attitude, and the inability to provide consistent accurate content.

Some argue that the problem is with Wikipedia's Wiki technology, which believes anyone can edit Wikipedia's content in its own way is the biggest and unalterable malady of Wikipedia, in which vandals can easily add false content, delete correct information, or arbitrarily add biased content to controversial political and religious entries.

Intellectuals such as Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy Wales, and Jonathan Zittrain, a professor at Oxford University in the United Kingdom, argue that this is partly due to prejudice against Wikipedia.In order to solve as many questions as possible about the quality of the entries as possible, Wikipedia has also come up with many corresponding methods and guidelines to ensure the quality of the articles.It is also hoped that the collaborative editing will provide a list of data sources sufficient for verification, verification and validation by others.

But critics also mentioned that much of the information on Wikipedia is produced by people who admire popular culture and other things to write their favorite projects, which means that in many cases websites are very vulnerable to artificial destruction by people who come from various reasons; and critics also point out that even if some reports prove that many items are easily recovered after they have been destroyed, there is still a lot of unconfirmed or contradictory information in Wikipedia.。