W8.1 Reliability of Wikipedia / Seung ju Lee

1. Summary

It has frequently questioned and evaluated the reliability of Wikipedia. Reliability has been verified statistically through comparative review, historical pattern analysis, and the advantages and disadvantages inherent in Wikipedia's unique editing process. Because Wikipedia allows anonymous editing. Many studies have raised questions about Wikipedia's reliability. So, Wikipedia doesn't trust itself. So, Wikipedia makes an effort to improve this problem. The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by lots of criteria. 

 2. Interesting point

 I thought Wikipedia could lose credibility because anyone could write an article. But it was interesting to try to verify reliability in many ways. So, I thought that I could trust and use Wikipedia.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WK 5.2 The Benevolent Dictator - Hanane Ben Abdeslam

In the reading it starts with the example of a “Neo-Nazi” dictator, it didn’t say when it exactly happened but I think it was during World War I and II. This dictator just did what he wanted to do, locking articles down, ban people, and protecting their own reputation and integrity. Actually, for someone to have that much power by a community founder is not unique to Wikipedia. Such leaders are often found in a project around, which a community develops, or otherwise emerge from a leaderless context by way of merit. However, Wikipedia is not an anarchy, democracy, nor a monarchy. Because of the voluntary and meritocratic character of open content communities it is not surprising that leaders are expected to lead by example as their very leadership is founded upon exemplary behavior. This means that leadership emerges through action rather than appointment. The prominent leader of an open content community is sometimes characterizing as a benevolent dictator. This is a variation on a t...
Read more

Why am I taking this course?-Woojin J

The reason why I am taking this course 'Collective Intelligence' is that I just wonder about Wikipedia. I usually use Google when I need to search about something and also get much information from Wikipedia. Although I really enjoy using Wikipedia, I don't have any information about 'Wikipedia'. Actually, I didn't even know I could edit the information myself until I applied for taking this course. So through this course, I want to get a lot of knowledge about Wikipedia and collective intelligence, the main element in which Wikipedia operate. In addition, I am a fourth grade student now preparing to find a job. So I want to have new knowledge and my own new ability through this course. I also think the society is always run by collective intelligence and uses collective intelligence to solve many problems. So I think I need to learn more about collective intelligence.
Read more

W6. Reading Assignment - CAI MUBO

Over time, the average quality of Wikipedia articles rises, but Wikipedians’ standards rise more quickly. I totally agree that this sentence. Wikipedia, and the collaborative way in which it is produced, is at the center of a heated debate. Much as reference works might inspire passionate dedication in their contributors, they also, seemingly, can inspire passionate disparagement. It should be emphasized that the "free" in Free Encylopedia mainly refers to two things: freedom of copyright and free of charge.In Europe and the US, copyright is strictly enforced, and Wikipedia's popular left model enables more people to take advantage of what it contains without having to think too much about copyright.Moreover, Wikipedia is free, unlike other encyclopedias of the time, and it is a manifestation of Wikipedia's purpose: to give free access to the sum of the world's knowledge.This idea is in the same breath as Encyclopaedia thought of the EnlightenAfter coming to Chin...
Read more