extra credit- Do you think Wikipedia is right to reject censorship? / ji eun Bang

 Do you think Wikipedia is right to reject censorship?


I think Wikipedia needs censorship. In particular, Wikipedia is a collective intelligence page that everyone can edit, so there may be misinformation or someone maliciously interferes with. There are small numbers of trolls and other disruptive editors who are seeking to edit our Wikipedia. Wikipedia has tens of thousands of volunteers (editors) but certainly has trolls. In order to manage this, Wikipedia administrators are also necessary and there is a reality.Censorship is necessary because in Internet culture, Internet trolls deliberately post controversial, inflammatory, wild or off-topic, or offensive or offensive content on the public Internet, causing people's emotional reactions and lowering the productivity of the gathering. 

The fact that Wikipedia is vulnerable to mischief or editing to distort information also causes it to lose accuracy and credibility. Korean Wikipedia on February 28, 2017 as an example in document applied to the Moon Jae-in mutilation is exposed to other sites There was a case. Person of the Moon Jae-in, the politicians of the Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea's political citizenship in basic information as a portal site Naver is changing some details in.Updated fixed right away, but the document, Wikipedia, Naver search results be corrected in the 4 p.m.[9] Moon Jae-in is about this editorial about whether or not a deliberate foul of a firm response will be suggesting. Even during the election season, this could be a problem. Wikipedia monitors need to constantly censor fake information as it may continue to spread intentional and systematic false information in order to win and lose the election ahead of the election.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WK 5.2 The Benevolent Dictator - Hanane Ben Abdeslam

In the reading it starts with the example of a “Neo-Nazi” dictator, it didn’t say when it exactly happened but I think it was during World War I and II. This dictator just did what he wanted to do, locking articles down, ban people, and protecting their own reputation and integrity. Actually, for someone to have that much power by a community founder is not unique to Wikipedia. Such leaders are often found in a project around, which a community develops, or otherwise emerge from a leaderless context by way of merit. However, Wikipedia is not an anarchy, democracy, nor a monarchy. Because of the voluntary and meritocratic character of open content communities it is not surprising that leaders are expected to lead by example as their very leadership is founded upon exemplary behavior. This means that leadership emerges through action rather than appointment. The prominent leader of an open content community is sometimes characterizing as a benevolent dictator. This is a variation on a t...
Read more

W2. What is Wikipedia - Seungju Lee

Summary Wikipedia is a multilingual online encyclopedia as an collaboration project. It isn't made by one people. Anyone can write and share information. It is maintained by non profit organizations. It is the largest and most popular  general reference work on the World Wide Web, and is one of the 20 most popular websites. Diverse information can be found in encyclopedia. Interesting point Wikipedia is made by group. All people in group can share their own information. Not only expert, but also anyone who have interest in topic, they can participate in make dictionary. I had a negative opinion about this in past, because this can affect on accuracy of information. But, after I realized that  this is "collaboration" project, many people can give a feedback to writers who post wrong information. So I could change my mind that that kind of feedback make good circulation on advance of wikipedia. And also it is collaboration project,  so I think variety of informat...
Read more

W7. Good Faith Collaboration / Kim Seon Woo

Summary   Wikipedia's culture includes the topics of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. The 2010 book. This book was first published on August 27, 2010 through MIT Press and has a preface to Lawrence Lessig.   This book is an ethnographic study of Wikipedia's history, practical and theoretical pioneers, and culture, including consensus and collaboration practices. This book is described as a pioneering ethnographic study of Wikipedia culture. Reagle's main paper was summed up with the claim that "Wikipedia's success may be less technical than the results of Wikipedia's community and their cultural norms." Interesting Point It is interesting to discuss Wikipedia's fundamental principle of operation, 'cooperation'. Wikipedia, which can be seen as an integral part of modern technology, would not be possible without cooperation. Discussion Does Wikipedia only have cooperation? How should conflict ...
Read more