Blogging through Wikipedia (2020)

W-Extra. “Wikipedia I met for one semester.” / Kim Seon Woo   During the last semester, I met Professor Wikipedia while attending Professor Peter's major. As I edited it, it was both difficult and difficult. However, in the process of sharing information and discussing with many people, I was able to further develop my knowledge. We had a hard time experiencing the corona virus, but once again, I think humanity is making progress. If we overcome this situation wisely, we can face a slightly better future. What was Wikipedia for you? Let's discuss it last.

W-Extra. “For quality control of Wiki.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  Wikipedia's editing model and wiki approach support editing changes and audacity. However, on some Wikipedias, it has been shown that some new wrong edits have a point of precedence over new good ones. As the entire edits to the article get closer to N, the quality improves (with unspecified features) from that point on, quality tends to level or degrade with further editing. Therefore, when the article reaches this quality level, further editing should be investigated further. This is called article quality defense. Interesting Point.  I think Wikipedia needs a more sophisticated system in order to provide better quality articles. A group advisory group that can confirm the accuracy of knowledge, such as a scholarship group. Discussion.  How can I improve the quality of Wikipedia?

W-Extra. “CC limitations.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization founded in 2001 with the purpose of partially sharing copyrights. The agency created the Creative Commons License (CCL), a copyright license on December 16, 2002. A typical project under the Creative Commons License (CCL) is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is licensed under a dual license of Creative Commons (CCL) and GNU Free Documentation (GFDL). Interesting Point.   I am very supportive of CC. However, there are limits to this. The original copyright holder initially promised partial sharing, but after that you may want to limit copyright to make money. However, there seems to be no policy. Discussion.   How can I overcome the limitations of CC?

W-Extra. “For a small number of opinions to be respected in Wiki.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Voting is one of the best ways to quantify opinions in large groups. Online communities with a common goal are constantly making decisions. In a small group of similarly thought individuals, consensus decisions can often be found in discussion. VotingIsEvil from such a group. However, as the group grows, it becomes CommunityMayNotScale. Each member of the group is likely not to agree with one of the existing members. According to MetcalfesLaw, the probability of conflict between two individuals increases geometrically. According to ReedsLaw, the likelihood of collisions between two subgroups increases exponentially. If an individual with objections is Community Exiled, the group can yield to GroupThink. If not excluded, you can delay the settlement decision indefinitely. Interesting Point.  I am well aware that voting majority in democracy is not a universal solution. This is because v...

W-Extra. “To improve online culture.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Fortunately, Wikipedia Ace Class Shadow provided helpful advice, recognizing that there was no perfect solution. Use the template to indicate that the discussion page is archived, or "take fair action to get closer to action and respect their common sense judgment. To this day there was once a closure that seemed completely inaccurate with this method."  In this debate, I'm not sure if these guidelines could convince the minority to support the legitimacy of the “use as needed” policy as a consistent suffix. Therefore, no punishment was offered to the parties for “cases of previous policy violations” beyond accusations of individual attacks and “some uncertainty about how to determine whether or not there is consensus in a particular case”. This is the ambiguity and challenge of consensus practice, and a source of temptation to use some voting systems. Interesting Point.  I am aware of the occasional v...

W-Extra. “The world information repository should be the world public sphere.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary HG Wells thought that the “World Encyclopedia” should be more than an information store and a “coordination and coordination agency”. I raised this debate early to explain Wikipedia's two opposing philosophies: inclusionism and deletionism. This issue and the proliferation of articles have caused much more minor debate, though not Belly Coz. If every TV show episode has its own article, how do you name these articles so that they don't conflict with other articles? This discussion demonstrates the misunderstanding of consensus and the difficulty of these decision-making practices in the public community. Interesting Point.  As mentioned in the summary, I think Wikipedia should act as a'public field' rather than just a repository. Discussing in a place where information is gathered is because you can exchange high-quality opinions as if you were talking in a libr...

W-Extra. “With the CC, the era of true information freedom opens.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization founded in 2001 with the purpose of partially sharing copyrights. The agency created the Creative Commons License (CCL), a copyright license on December 16, 2002. A typical project under the Creative Commons License (CCL) is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is licensed under a dual license of Creative Commons (CCL) and GNU Free Documentation (GFDL). Interesting Point. I actively support the CC movement. Of course, personal copyright is very important, but I think that the value of information on the Internet must be allowed to some degree in order to shine more. So I hope that this culture will be expanded. Discussion.  However, CC culture in Korea is unfamiliar. How do you popularize it?

W-Extra. “Enemy of students at Hanyang University: Wikipedia” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  In Western culture, Wikipedia has increased online encyclopedia projects with more people using it for more information. The openness of many parody Wikipedias, where individuals damage or modify articles in a non-constructive way. Nevertheless, others use Wikipedia as a reference or feature individuals who positively compare intelligence with Wikipedia. In some cases, Wikipedia is not used as an encyclopedia at all, but instead as a character trait or game. Wikipedia has also become culturally important, as many people see their Wikipedia items as a status symbol. Interesting Point.  It sounds ridiculous, but Wikipedia is described as hell among students of the Department of Information and Social Sciences at Hanyang University. Perhaps it was because Professor Peter's major was boring with Wikipedia. We always respond to the idea that the challenge is difficult. "It's better tha...

W-Extra. “What are the alternatives to getting accurate information?” / Kim Seon Woo Summary According to the US research team, about 60% of company-related content among documents registered in English-language Wikipedia has been found to be misleading. The research team's professor estimates that this is because certain companies are putting favorable content on the company in Wikipedia to make the image positive. Interesting Point.   It was a rather shocking news for me, who usually trusted Wikipedia and referenced the material. The findings, about 60% of which is wrong, indicate a sense of crisis about what we are doing on this task. Discussion.   How can I make Wikipedia reliable?

W-Extra. “The Future of Media: Wikipedia.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  Wikipedia is owned and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that holds free works, has no commercial advertising, and is primarily funded through donations. As of 2020, if you combine more than 300 language versions, including over 6 million English versions and 501,479 Korean versions, more than 40 million articles will be recorded, and it will grow steadily. Wikipedia is copyrighted under the Creative Commons License (CCL) and the GNU Free Documentation (GFDL) dual license. Both licenses are for free content, and if certain requirements are met, they are not restricted by use. Interesting Point.  I thought Wikipedia was an alternative to commercialized and industrialized mass media. Despite the absence of advertisements and a'non-profit foundation' run through donations, Wikipedia has a tremendous influence worldwide. This is a new media trend. Discussion.  How can...

W-Extra. “The result of cutting-edge technology: Wikipedia.” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  The first impulse to answer the question of Wikipedia's success is to focus on technology. Obviously, as can be seen from my history, technology has played an important role in encouraging the vision of the universal encyclopedia. In addition, beyond inspiration, networking skills and related collaborative technologies can support openness and accessibility, facilitating socialization of officers and newcomers. On the wiki, contributors can communicate asynchronously and contribute gradually. You can modularize your work.  You can easily reverse your changes. Further adjustments to accessible documents, discussion pages, templates and automated tools However, technology is important but insufficient. Despite the wiki pixie dust, many projects fail. This is the question "Why is something like Wikipedia possible?" It leads to the question "How can I understand Wikipedia's col...

W-Extra. “Can I be neutral?” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  However, as "neutral" is understood not as a description of the encyclopedia, but as a contributor's eagerness and intentional position, one must recognize the universal attitude, openness, and good faith ideals from a similar perspective. For example, within the public content community, there are inherent tensions (eg “unstructured tyranny”) and practical difficulties (eg Wikipedia office action). Likewise, it would be wrong if Wikipedia should focus on goodwill (assuming it's doing its best for others, working for patience, citizens, and humor), suggesting that it is a harmonious community of benevolent saints. Interesting Point.  During everyday life or during school class discussions, I always face'people who take a neutral position'. They often take a'neutral position', claiming that they are not biased to either the left or the right, to conservatives or progress. Wikipedia is the same...

W-Extra. “What are the criteria for credibility in references?” / Kim Seon Woo Summary References can facilitate and shape the flow of social anxiety. As you can see from Morton's Webster's Third history, many of the debates related to publishing were about something other than the strengths of a particular dictionary. I generalize the debate by looking briefly at the past about the question of how references are related to conservative and progressive tensions, and how Wikipedia in the past will get entangled in similar debates. Interesting Point.  In the writings I encounter as I go around the Internet space,'Reliability in References' has always been a question. Where can I get the reliability of the reference? Is there a clear standard of reliability for references? Isn't it different in each country and institution in the world? Who manages the standards for this? Discussion.  What are the reliability standards for the literature we refer to as we d...

W-Extra. “To expand online democracy?” / Kim Seon Woo Summary The way we collaborate with Wikipedia is at the heart of heated discussions. Just as reference works can inspire passionate devotion to contributors, they can also inspire passionate imbalances. In 2004, Michael Gorman, former chairman of the American Library Association, wrote opposition to criticize Google and its book-scanning project. He was surprised by the negative online response to his work, but after a couple of years he doubled the attack. In 2007, we focused on blogs and wiki encyclopedias to explain the impact of "digital tsunami" on learning. In a blog essay titled "Jabberwiki", Gorman praised Sanger's abandonment of Wikipedia to more professional, friendly citizens and criticized those who continue to contribute or use Wikipedia. Interesting Point.  We know that Wikipedia's core power is in discussion. The corona virus crisis has activated the face-to-face era. At this time, ...

W-Extra. “What should a malicious interferer do?” / Kim Seon Woo Summary  Goodwill cooperation: Wikipedia's culture covers the topics of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community, Joseph M. Reagle Jr. The 2010 book. This book was first published on August 27, 2010 through MIT Press and has a preface to Lawrence Lessig. This book is an ethnographic study of Wikipedia's history, practice, and theoretical pioneers, and culture, including consensus and collaboration practices. Interesting Point.  Wikipedia operates on the basis of good faith cooperation. By the way, as you roam the Internet, you often see malicious jammers. Those who spread malicious comments, slanderous posts, and false information. Discussion.  How can we punish them? If punishment is difficult, how can you edify their actions?

What do you think are going to be important communication technology? Recent years have seen a major shift as Internet becomes mobile- we can use it "on the go." through laptops, smartphones and tablets. Soon we may able to access Internet through googles other ways. I think 5G is an important communication technology in the future. Fifth-generation communication technology is a future technology that connects mobile devices and networks at high speeds. 5G technology with fully connected sensors and devices will change the economy and business policy. Furthermore, it will serve as a basic platform for the entire ecosystem that breaks down geographical and cultural boundaries. 5G aims to receive content as soon as it is sent. In the future, intelligent connections and sensors will enable people to recognize and interact with objects around them or even thousands of kilometers away. If data is continuously collected and analyzed using sensors, devices can act on behalf o...

Wikipedia is not the first project which aims to collect and organize the "sum total of human knowledge" but it is the most efficient of all attempts to do so. Why? Wikipedia can get information from all fields of knowledge. Regardless of the subject, there is information about all kinds of knowledge and there is no need for experts in each field of knowledge. Wikipedia is therefore a collection of "the sum of human knowledge." Other websites do not have a "discussion"  where only experts can answer and freely express their opinions. Wikipedia is open to everyone, whether they are students, office workers, or professionals, if they have knowledge in the field.  In this regard, Wikipedia seems to be able to develop into a website that gathers information from all fields of knowledge. In fact, there are few such pages except Wikipedia. Instead, Wikipedia has five strict rules: "WikiPedia is an encyclopedia, Wikipedia looks from a neutral perspe...

Why do people contribute to Wikipedia? Wikipedia attracts volunteers (editor), editing them. What Fey don't get them. So, Why do people to contribute to Wikipedia? First, 69 percent of people like to share their knowledge. In addition, 64 percent of people, failure or incorrect information wants to fix it. 50 % of people wanted to know about a subject not handled right. Also wanted to learn new skills, and to spread the knowledge they wanted to expand. There is a person who is able to edit Wikipedia's debate and wanted to see whether friends or family wanted to participate in or college and taking part in the Wikipedia.There was also because through editing at school or work reasons. The last reason is why I am to participate in the Wikipedia editing.  Only 2 percent of people edit because of school assignments or jobs. But now I'm having fun sharing my knowledge with Wikipedia and I've included in 69%

 Who do you think edits Wikipedia? The young, the old,female, male, Americans, Koreans?  I think men in their 30s have the most editors. And in actuality,   According to the worldwide Wikipedia Editors Survey 2011 of all the Wikipedias, 91% of editors are male. However, the number of women editors is on the rise.   On January 30, 2011, an article in the New York Times quoted the Wikimedia Foundation's announcement and reported that less than 13 percent of the Wikipedia contributors were women. So why does this result? The "Discussion" page, where discussions are made about the contents of the document, is not attractive to women because of its highly controversial nature, but rather can give them "fear as soon as they see it." Women also have equal knowledge of men and can defend their point of view, but" disputes, arguments, and fierce defense are still often considered masculine in American society, and women's remarks in this tone can lead to negat...

 Do you think Wikipedia is right to reject censorship? I think Wikipedia needs censorship. In particular, Wikipedia is a collective intelligence page that everyone can edit, so there may be misinformation or someone maliciously interferes with. There are small numbers of trolls and other disruptive editors who are seeking to edit our Wikipedia. Wikipedia has tens of thousands of volunteers (editors) but certainly has trolls. In order to manage this, Wikipedia administrators are also necessary and there is a reality.Censorship is necessary because in Internet culture, Internet trolls deliberately post controversial, inflammatory, wild or off-topic, or offensive or offensive content on the public Internet, causing people's emotional reactions and lowering the productivity of the gathering.  The fact that Wikipedia is vulnerable to mischief or editing to distort information also causes it to lose accuracy and credibility. Korean Wikipedia on February 28, 2017 as an example i...

When we work on Wikipedia, there is often Harassment. It bullies Wikipedia users in many ways. Continue to follow or send messages to the user. I also received 2 emails. I ignored it. Because I knew it was Harassment. My professor announced us some IDs. So I've already known the information about harassment in advance and been paying attention to their movements. Wikipedia is a free space open to everyone. Therefore trolls could be everywhere in Wikipedia. We must know how to distinguish such trolls from normal users, and be careful not to be harmed by them.

Categorization Summary Wikipedia is increasingly developed for user convenience. Wikipedia is adding more functions as well as simple modifications. Categories play an important role in Wikipedia. The function of a category is to group pages under similar themes. Helps readers find and navigate the subject area, view pages arranged by title, and find article relationships. Wikipedia pages categorize the characteristics of readers, knowledge, essentials, definitions, and topics into categories. Categories are usually at the bottom of the article page. Click a category name to go to that particular category. It is also possible to support navigation with subclassification. Review This page shows you in detail how to use the cafe chain. I think one of the most important things in Wikipedia is the category. If the categories are well separated, I can quickly find the information I want and it is much more useful. I thought the only way to classify the article was in the Table of Co...

Article development Summary I learned how to write Wikipedia articles well and how to move on to the next level. To find or develop an article that has not been written first and set a topic. You can also write articles by looking for related articles or books. Attaching appropriate relevant images or graphics is one of the ways in which the quality of the article increases. It also asks for comments from fellow editors and looks for areas to improve. This page was very useful for editing Wikipedia. Review  The first step in writing Wikipedia articles is to search and find articles that have not yet been written. I found this process the hardest when I first edited Wikipedia. I wanted to deal with what I was interested in, but there were many articles that already existed. Therefore, I chose to continue adding content to existing articles that already exist. It is also a good way to find an article to develop. It was fun because I could write the article as I wanted if I pas...

Creative Commons Summary Wikimedia Commons is a media repository created and managed by volunteers. Free encyclopedia, Wikipedia, offers a central repository for free license photos, diagrams, animations, music, voice text, video clips and all kinds of media that are useful for the most popular Wikimedia project. Anyone can put data on this site. You must have a free license to upload images. Most of the images on the Internet are copyrighted and should not be used unless there is a justifiable reason. One of the key principles of Wikimedia Commons is that the content stored here must be freely reusable anywhere in the world in the same way as the encyclopedia content (licensed with CC BY-SA). This means we restrict free content. In addition, the process use applies only to the use of the edit context and not to the media repository. Copyright laws vary from country to country. Thus, there can be many different ways to use the process. Each country has one unique interpretation, a...

Free culture movement & Remix culture A free cultural movement is one that can freely modify and distribute content about society. The Free Culture Movement opposes excessively restrictive copyright laws. Because this hinders creativity. This movement is free to exchange ideas. The first person to do this exercise was Stewart Brand. He tried to gain access to information through the "Longer Copyright Act." Commons (CC) is the organization that is commonly associated with free culture. CC encourages creative sharing and spreading of ideas for cultural activities, scientific advances and business breakthroughs. Remix culture is a culture that allows and encourages derivatives by combining or editing existing materials to create new creations or products. Remix culture is basically about allowing copyright owners efforts to improve, change, integrate, or otherwise remix their work. Combining content has been a common practice, but has been increasingly limited by increas...

I personally feel that the completeness and independence of the classification are not the most important issues. The most important thing is how you use this classification. I am a typical pragmatist and do not want to study these so-called theories like a scholar. In fact, as far as the current Internet development is concerned, the full-text retrieval technology has encountered a bottleneck, and more attention has been shifted to vertical search. This is called a very brutal growth in the beginning. After occupying the market, the real test of whether you can survive is whether you can be refined in an independent field. This is very important. For example, if you want to query job information, will you first choose Baidu; or if you want to query for e-commerce information, will you first choose Baidu? These questions reflect the current trend, that is, vertical search will make people use it with more confidence. But the average user is already accustomed to input in full-text sea...

1. Summary When specifying category names, you should be especially careful to select the names correctly. Generally, regular nouns should not be capitalized except when they come at the beginning of the title, or the name of the set category should be plural. In addition, there are many general rules and many special rules exist. Pages are classified into various pages, including articles, user pages, draft pages, image pages, etc. All Wikipedia pages must belong to one or more categories. Considerations for sorting keys include the alignment order in the English Wikipedia, ignoring the merging of large letters and diacritics, and the major articles in the category are sorted by height with a blank space and displayed at the top of the category. 2. Interesting Point Through this page, we learned about the importance of categories in Wikipedia. It was particularly interesting about the rules of designation. The special rules were a little different than when writing or editing other W...

Learning from trolls Bullying is a special problem. Recently, cyberbullying is becoming a serious social issue. Wikipedia is also a cyber space where users and users meet. And Wikipedia's harassment document clearly warns or advises against harassment. This harassment document states that not only a conflict between users but also the excessive concentration of specific information when posting information about a specific person is also bullying. I have never been bullied before - in other words, I have never seen trollers - but I have seen documents about Wikipedia culture. The document is listed by the trollers that existed in Wikipedia history; as such, Wikipedia is known for its collective intelligence documents, and thus has multiple harassment (both outside and inside). If Wikipedia users have something to learn from trollers, it is about how useless the activities are that harm others. In fact, as shown in the harassment document, the way to deal with the trol...

1) Summary Wikipedia's category system makes it easy for people to see and access other articles related to that article. Wikipedia pages in a hierarchy of categories which readers, knowledge essential—defining—characteristics of a topic. All Wikipedia pages must belong to one or more categories and be value neutral. It should also be clear why articles are placed in specific categories. 2) Interesting point I actually found it easy to edit articles through this category when editing Wikipedia. I found and edited the articles I was writing and the ones in the relevant category categories. I was curious about the criteria of the category, but I was able to find out through this opportunity. 3) Discussion What category are you most interested in?

Summary This reading is about categorization. When we write articles on Wikipedia, we can use categories to guide people who read. Categories help you find information easily within an article. You need to know how to create a category to set it up. Categorizes are important for Wikipedia users to find relevant article they wanted. Interesting/Learned I found out that a category was a miniature of an article and realized that it was really important. Discuss How many categories on Wikipedia?

Summary MoS is a guide to the format of Wikipedia articles. The simplest way to refer to the format of a article is to copy a well-written article. The lead section is the first part of the article, and should include a concise definition of the article in the length of one to four paragraphs. The article consists of sections and subsections. Headings should omit the word "the" and the title of the article, and only the first word is capitalized. Images can be attached to help the reader understand the article. Citing should use reliable sources and give the reader sufficient information to identify them. It is also important to use links to help readers understand the subject of the article. In addition, style and formatting should be maintained consistently within the article. Interesting Point I didn't know there was a separate guide to the formatting of the article. I was wondering how to organize the contents of the image attachment box, now I can refer to it after s...

Categorization Users edit articles in Wikipedia, but Wikipedia has more features, not only simple modifications but more. For example, discussion (talk) tabs, user messages, user talk pages, sandbox features, drafts articles, document frames, media insertions... and Wikipedia also provides users with beta services such as multilingual translation. However, Wikipedia users do not know how to use these services. Wikipedia is a big culture. Many people are in Wikipedia culture. Wikipedia is used and edited by millions of people. So there must be some rules. Rules for document format, rules for discussion, rules for grammar, etc. If you do not keep the rules, Wikipedia will be easily disappeared. To protect Wikipedia culture, users must observe the rules, but as the Wikipedia culture is wide, the rules become more and more, and users eventually do not know about the rules.  The first person to use Wikipedia doesn't know how to edit it, like I did once. For these use...

A lot of care must be taken when designating categories. In particular, it is important to be careful about naming categories so that people do not get confused and reflect their characteristics. In addition, I could learn how to specify and set categories. Designating categories is more important than simply categorizing articles. It helps people deliver accurate information. If you need to organize a category, you should refer to it and make a quality composition.

1. Summary Categories are used to group pages among similar topics. This helps Wikipedia-using readers find relevant articles through sorted pages as they navigate through topics. Categories are usually at the bottom of Wikipedia article pages. In addition, categories can create subsections to construct a tree-like structure. Therefore, proper use of these categories is important. Categories function as connecting and sorting pages. Wikipedia’s users can also search for information according to a specific sort. 2. What interesting Through this material, I learned the technical part of making categories. I didn't put it in the summary, but I learned how to use it practically. I think we can organize more articles and make them easier for people to see. Through what I learned last week and what I learned today, I have a standard to make my articles more complete. 3. Discussion How can I choose the criteria for grouping categories?

1. Summary The category system has a central goal that provide navigational links to Wikipedia pages in a hierarchy of categories which readers, knowing essential—defining—characteristics of a topic. It can browse and quickly find sets of pages on topics that are defined by those characteristics. When naming a category, one should be particularly careful and choose its name accurately. After you have determined an appropriate category name and know its parent category, you are ready to create the new category. Every Wikipedia page should belong to at least one category. Categorization of articles must be verifiable and neutral. 2. Interesting point It is very interesting that every Wikipedia page should belong to at least one category. But also it was really difficult for me to categorize articles that I started by myself.

1.Summary Wikipedia's central goal of categorization helps readers identify the characteristics of items and quickly find articles on topics defined by the characteristics they want to find. Category names should be carefully defined and general rules are set. Also, articles must belong to at least one category. Each categorized page should be placed in all specific categories. Categorization should also be verifiable. It should be clear enough that the article can demonstrate why it is placed in a particular category. As with the content of the article, the classification of categories should maintain a neutral perspective. 2. Interesting Point I edited articles other than the assigned articles every week, but I didn't know they were categorized, so I used to look for them myself. In the beginning, I searched directly for the topic I was interested in, but as time went by, the topic I was interested in was running out and I was confused about what to edit. If I had known in...

Most of the articles in Wikipedia are associated in a category or two. Due to the categorization, people can easily check and access to other related articles. By organizing the articles this way, Wikipedia can maintain quality lists of articles without any chaotic mess. Sometimes, the categories closely related to each other get grouped into one, and turns into Wikiproject. We all know Wikipedian article is assessed by other Wikipedians and eventually gets its grade from stub to featured, and by the importance of it. But an article also can be assessed in its Wikiproject once more, both its quality of content and its importance. It was really hard for me to categorize articles that I started by myself. Because there might be a category that I might be trying to assign my article into, but I just haven't typed the correct word for it. For example, I was trying to assign my article of  데이비드_A._와일리  into 'living people' category in Korean Wikipedia, but I couldn't find ...

Wikipedia culture & Wikipedia in culture American society makes better use of Wikipedia than Korea. People feature individuals who use Wikipedia as reference work or positively compare intelligence with Wikipedia. Also, in some cases Wikipedia is not used as an encyclopedia at all, but instead as a character trait or game. Thus Wikipedia has become culturally important. As Wikipedia grows, it has been mentioned in various cultural fields. He used Wikipedia in various cultures such as movie critics, sociology professors, researchers, comedians, and so on. But there were also critics of Wikipedia. Someone mentioned Wikipedia terms and ambiguity, and someone criticized Wikipedia for having false information about itself. The inaccuracies of the Wikipedia have also been culturally described. There was an argument for the negative impact of Wikipedia on culture. Wikipedia argued that the proliferation of user-generated content obscures and devalues existing high-quality information ...

1. Summary Every article begins with an idea of a contributor. Everyone who sees Wikipedia can write articles. Let's search first and then look for articles about the topic. If you see a red link, let's make an article. If you don't have time to write an entire article, consider writing a "stub." Once you've decided on your Wikipedia theme, use Wikipedia's search engine to find relevant materials. See Google or Wikipedia free English newspaper sources and so on. In addition, there are various sites such as EBSCO and JSTOR. Start the article with a concise introduction that defines the subject and mentions the most important points. It is good to finish the article with appropriate images or graphics. 2. Interesting Point While reading this document, it was helpful for me to edit or create a document, such as this Wikipedia assignment. In particular, I thought it would be good to visit these sites in Korea by looking at the sites that are lookin...

Wikipedia is the largest and most popular general reference site on the web, anyone can contribute. But how do you start? Here we take a look. Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites in the world and is always looking for new volunteer contributors. Most importantly, it is not easy to become a complicated process. In this article, you will learn how to become a Wikipedia contributor and what it means. In this way, you will have a better understanding of the daily work of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the largest and most popular general reference website on the web. The website (and many of its sub-sites) is owned and operated by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation and can be supported in more than 300 languages ​​through various platforms, including a large number of mobile applications. Perhaps Wikipedia has been so popular for nearly 20 years because it continues to rely on the community of volunteer contributors or so-called Wikipedians. According to the statistics of Wikipe...

1. Summary Every article starts with an idea in the mind of a contributor. Anyone can create articles about anything, as long as they belong in Wikipedia. It is a good idea to search first. And if we see a red link, we can create an article. When we start Wikipedia, it's helpful to read the guidelines and tutorials on creating new articles to get an idea of what you should consider. Such matters as the scope, format, references, and NPOV in a Wikipedia article. If we do not have the time to write a full article, we can  consider writing a "stub", which is a very short article. Once we decide the theme of writing, we can use many kinds of search engines like google and Wikipedia newspapers. And, start an article with a concise lead section or introduction defining the topic and mentioning the most important points.  And it is better to finish the article with a good relevant image or graphic. 2. Interesting point Reading this article, I can learn man...

1) Summary Wikipedia articles have certain rules in their ratings. Unwritten articles, stubs, under-development articles, feature articles, etc. are on the list. However, although these rules have been clearly written and proposed in every Wikipedia, it is difficult to match everything that Wikipedia has asked for in the article. Most articles in the Wikipedia are classified as stubs or starting levels, which are at the lowest level. This article has the potential to develop by quoting research-related articles such as well-organized articles, outline others, create appropriate images, encyclopedia references in different languages, and evaluate others. 2) Interesting Point It was very helpful to improve the quality of my Wikipedia article that I am currently editing and writing. 3) Discussion Do you think it's reasonable for the quality rating currently specified by Wikipedia?

Summary MoS is a guide to the format of Wikipedia articles. The simplest way to refer to the format of a article is to copy a well-written article. The lead section is the first part of the article, and should include a concise definition of the article in the length of one to four paragraphs. The article consists of sections and subsections. Headings should omit the word "the" and the title of the article, and only the first word is capitalized. Images can be attached to help the reader understand the article. Citing should use reliable sources and give the reader sufficient information to identify them. It is also important to use links to help readers understand the subject of the article. In addition, style and formatting should be maintained consistently within the article. Interesting Point I didn't know there was a separate guide to the formatting of the article. I was wondering how to organize the contents of the image attachment box, now I can refer to...

1.Summary The manual style introduces five kinds. There are the mos, readable division, Linking and Consistency. The read section should be independent as a brief overview of the article, and the material that comes out first should reflect the importance of the topic. Also, only if the image is better than the existing image should be added or replaced, and when inserting a link, the first word should be associated with the relevant article on the subject. Consistency, stability and clarity are important in making Wikipedia articles. It is wrong to change style without good reason. Also, articles should be easy to read and find information in encyclopedias from reliable sources. Some of Wikipedia's articles are detailed from the outset, but most develop into well-written compositions over time due to the participation of others. First, I can think of the topic I want to write about, and if Wikipedia doesn't have an article on that topic, I can produce an article. If you ...

I could learn how to develop articles in Wikipedia. First, I do research on the subject. Check what is already out on the subject of my choice. And you can find articles related to this and get academic help. It is effective to look for relevant books to go further from the article and build more solid information. After completing the research on the subject, I start writing articles. After that, finish and review through colleagues. I was able to learn how to write articles on Wikipedia, but I didn't know how to write them because I've never actually written them myself, but this has given me a sense of rationality.

Summary This article explains how Wikipedia can develop further. Wikipedia has a lot of comprehensive writing, but there are also many stump writing. We can further develop these stump writing. And we can also develop articles by using reliable and accurate references, and by using a variety of image materials with clear copyrights.  To develop stump writing, we may be able to find a solution in Wikipedia of other countries, where local information as well as articles in the English version of Wikipedia can be obtained.  Various links can be inserted into the completed article to make the article richer. And you can complete an article by examining various errors, such as typos. Interesting/Learned I learned how to enrich Wikipedia articles.  And I could think about getting detailed information from Wikipedia in other countries. Discuss Can we issue the article which has only a short stub?

Summary  Creative Commons (CC) is a non-profit organization founded in 2001 with the purpose of partially sharing copyrights. The agency created the Creative Commons License (CCL), a copyright license on December 16, 2002. A typical project under the Creative Commons License (CCL) is Wikipedia. Wikipedia is licensed under a dual license of Creative Commons (CCL) and GNU Free Documentation (GFDL), which began in 2001 with headquarters in San Francisco. Founder and chairman Professor Lawrence Resig created the organization to solve the problems in his Eldred vs. Ashcroft case. Interesting Point  The'clear definition' on the copyright issue, which was so sensitive, was interesting. It's not just "Don't use mine!" Please keep this.” It was very interesting to change. Discussion How can I expand CC?

Reliability of Wikipedia and Reliable sources Wikipedia is edited voluntarily by a volunteer editor.Since Wikipedia is done online, it has been criticized for the reliability of facts in the editing process. There may be false information because anyone can edit it anonymously. Inaccurate information has not been modified for months. The reliability of Wikipedia articles is based on the accuracy of the information provided within the article, the adequacy of the images provided with the article, the appropriateness of the style and focus of the article, the sensitivity to false information, and the exclusion and elimination of false information. Wikipedia articles should be based on a well-known and reliable source of factual confirmation and accuracy. When quoting, one of the work itself, the author, or the publisher of the work affects reliability. Wikipedia should present a neutral perspective. The source should be free from prejudice. Political articles may contain some politic...

Good Faith Collaboration Wikipedia has many collaborative systems. The most interesting thing for me was the Wikimedia Foundation. The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit charity. Mainly the main goal of the general foundation is to increase profits. But the biggest goal of the Wikimedia Foundation is to develop, maintain and manage Wikipedia and to release the entire content to people free of charge. Wikimedia has few copyright restrictions and is based on volunteers and resources, which is one of the reasons why Wikipedia is growing so much. At first, the foundation was executed by volunteers. Currently, however, more than 350 employees and contractors work. This means that the foundation has become very large. Also, Wikipedia's administrators think it is one of the reasons why it has become one of the top five websites in the world. Administrators can manage Wikipedia's biggest weakness, various disputes, restrict inappropriate articles or untrue news, and block conf...

The central goal of the category system is to provide navigational links to Wikipedia pages in a hierarchy of categories which readers, knowing essential, defining, characteristics of a topic, can browse and quickly find sets of pages on topics that are defined by those characteristics. Moreover, categories are not the only means of enabling users to browse sets of related pages. Other tools which may be used instead of or alongside categories in particular instances include lists and navigation boxes. When naming a category, one should be particularly careful and choose its name accurately. After you have determined an appropriate category name and know its parent category, you are ready to create the new category. To create a category, first add an article to that category. In such cases, the desired contents of the category should be described on the category page, similar to how the list selection criteria are described in a stand-alone list. Furthermore, the description can also ...

W12. Citations from web portal My last articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_mythology The Wikipedia article I recently revised is about Korean mythology. In fact, there are many articles about Korean mythology. However, Korean myths in English Wikipedia are distorted because they are simple, compact, and used at foreign views. I revise the articles by referring to the homepage of the government agency and edit the myth of Korea as much as possible. One thing I realized while editing many articles is that there are so many citations from Never, which is a web engine, in the articles of Korean myth article. Never is Korea's most famous web search portal, and you can search for a lot of information at Never. But according to Wikipedia's citation guide, which I learned, it is best to make a citation in materials such as journals and papers. So is it bad or good to quote the encyclopedia that the search portal has? I am sure many Wikipedia articles have t...